Comments for Inside the Atheists Studio

Comment on Farewell, Hitch by sheafferhistorian

sheafferhistorian — Sat, 17 Dec 2011 05:32:59 +0000

Another picture of him drinking Johnny Red…he claimed to favor Black ?

Comment on Dan Carlin for President by Anonymous Atheist

Anonymous Atheist — Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:56:47 +0000

It sounds like a good idea, but unfortunately it seems this particular implementation is flawed – even corrupt. There are over 150 investigative blog posts about Americans Elect at http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/category/americanselect/

Comment on PODCAST: Ryan Haupt by Episode 106 | A Big Pile of SCIENCE | Science... sort of

Episode 106 | A Big Pile of SCIENCE | Science... sort of — Wed, 05 Oct 2011 16:21:23 +0000

[...] for listening! Check out Ryan on the latest episode of Inside the Atheists Studio if you’re not sick of hearing him talk [...]

Comment on PODCAST: Jennifer Hancock by Handy Humanism Hangout « Inside the Atheists Studio

Handy Humanism Hangout « Inside the Atheists Studio — Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:04:57 +0000

[...] Tuesday, Jennifer Hancock will be entering the Studio via a G+ Hangout to talk about her new book, “Jen Hancock’s [...]

Comment on 911 Dichotomy by Living out of Eden

Living out of Eden — Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:28:09 +0000

Probably yes,

Comment on 911 Dichotomy by theGuy

theGuy — Mon, 12 Sep 2011 01:47:50 +0000

I hear what you’re saying—and we could have that conversation—but this post, which you’ve objected to, doesn’t address those issues. That would be an entirely different post, don’t you think?

Comment on 911 Dichotomy by [In the news] Muslim youth fight 9/11 biases with ‘jihad by heart’ – GMAnews.tv | Human Rights Online Philippines

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 23:45:50 +0000

[...] 911 Dichotomy (insidetheatheistsstudio.com) [...]

Comment on 911 Dichotomy by Living out of Eden

Living out of Eden — Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:11:27 +0000

I do not doubt that Al-qaeda was the perpetrator of the attacks.
I was referring more to basically two aspects:

1.- The incoherency in the official version which, if we had read something like that a week before 9/11 would have sounded outlandish to anyone. The absolute inconsistency of the 9/11 Comission report, leaving so many issues unexplained, to be accepted as a dogma.

2.- The different and supported information that has been collected eversince, that demonstrate (quite) clearly, that at least, a true investigation on the facts, should be carried out.

I don’t like Conspiracy theories for they are difficult to base in facts. But I’ve been searching data since some time now, and found that nothing matches in the Govmnt version.

I’ve posted 4 different texts today, one of which are links to the different pages/sites with info about what might (I will also give the benefit of doubt) have happened that day. I hope you find it useful.

Comment on 911 Dichotomy by theGuy

theGuy — Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:00:07 +0000

No apologies necessary. I’m not sure exactly what it is you are objecting to. It sounds like maybe you object to my accepting Al Qaida as the perpetrators. But I’d like to give you the benefit of the doubt, so feel free clarify a bit and offer some of the “evident facts” you speak of, if you wish.

Comment on 911 Dichotomy by Living out of Eden

Living out of Eden — Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:44:05 +0000

Apologies for what I will write next:

You don’t sound either skeptic, atheist, free-thinker or supporter of reason in this post.
There are evident facts on the 9/11 that leave a huge amount of loose ends, on why, who, how and what for, the attacks were carried out and ……. “allowed”????

Any considerations regarding “facts” being explained in a more “rational” way?